9911796707
TMI Blog1998 (11) TMI 199X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the Appellant. Shri A. Ashokan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. - These five appeals arise out of two orders of Commissioner (Appeals). Since these have a common issue and relate to the same assessee they are being disposed of in this single order. 2. The common issue in all these 5 appeals is the eligibility as input of rejected final products retu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ber of judgments where the Tribunal has held that when comparing the description of the inputs in the declaration and in the documents covering the inputs a certain degree of leniency has to be shown. In this regard Tribunal has observed that broad description should suffice. Thus where proper wires and rods were declared as inputs, aluminium bronze rods were accepted by the Tribunal to be covered ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e present case we find that the rejected final goods received back and the inputs fall under the same tariff sub-heading. The difference between the terms `resin' and `plastics' cannot be held to be fatal to the entitlement of the assessees. 6. At this stage we take cognizance of the submissions made by the learned DR. He submits that in terms of the declaration where 3 inputs are shown as g ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
