1999 (10) TMI 225

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... per : Shri J.H. Joglekar, Member (T)]. When this stay application was argued, it appeared at this stage itself the main appeal could be taken up for disposal. Both sides agreeing, this was done, after granting waiver of the condition of predeposit of duty amounting to Rs. 10,16,887/-. 2. We have heard Shri Anthony Fernandes Excise Manager for the appellants and Shri Deepak Kumar for the Re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... istered person s name and address, on account of whose instructions the goods have been despatched. The consignee in this case will be the end user. In such a situation the registered person s invoices is not required for availment of Modvat credit. The duplicate copy of the manufacturer s invoice under Rule 52A will serve as cover for transport and for availment of Modvat by the end user. It w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... comply with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Hence the present appeal. 4. We find that the Assistant Commissioner did not apply his mind to the submissions made before him. When this fact was brought out to the notice of Commissioner, he found no prima facie case to be made out in favour of the assessees. We find that the lack of application of mind visible in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X