Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1999 (7) TMI 310

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 8/96, dated 23-7-1996. He has, therefore, set aside the Orders-in-Original and allowed the appeal. 2. Revenue appeals on the ground that learned Commissioner (Appeals) has basically gone by the purity of the end product as dry matter which a test of the Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad on record showed to be 99.4% on dry basis. However, as has been submitted by the learned DR, Shri S. Sankaravadivelu, the Central Excise Tariff in this regard, though based on the Harmonised System of Nomenclature, does not contain any details which could help to make the right classification between 29.05 as claimed by the respondents and 38.23 as claimed by revenue in this appeal. Therefore, learned DR submits that of necessity we have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s that since in the respondent s case the manufacturing process does not commence with the use of glucose or invert sugar, which syrup would contain high abundance of mono saccharides, therefore, the product was classified under 38.23 by the original authority correctly. As against that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has instead of considering the details of process of manufacture, merely based his conclusions on the purity of the end product by assuming that such a purity could not have been achieved unless only glucose syrup containing mono saccharides was used. Learned DR submits there is no evidence on record to support this presumption of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). 4. Secondly, learned DR submits that in case the produc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , is a process which is deliberately employed to take out the disaccharides and poly saccharides content in the syrup even if the syrup may be dextrose or glucose. On this basis, learned Advocate submits that since the process of manufacture employed by the respondents ensured that immediately before the hydrogenation stage the syrup contains abundance of mono saccharides by employing a process of separation, therefore, even as per the HSN Notes, the product would be classifiable under 29.05 in view of Note-1 to Chapter 29. Learned Advocate, therefore, goes on to submit that since the product would fall under Chapter 29 as a single identified compound, therefore, it would not be a drug intermediate but a finished bulk drug itself. Hence, th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ration was undertaken by the respondents to produce a syrup which had an abundance of mono saccharides. That this process of separation was undertaken has been clearly claimed by the respondents in this write-up. 8. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and the records of the case. We are of the considered opinion that in cases where the Tariff description read with the Notes and Explanations provided in the Central Excise Tariff is not a complete guide to help us to arrive at the appropriate classification of an item, there is no harm in resorting to consulting the Harmonised System of Nomenclature and Notes thereof, which is much more exhaustive in nature. When we do this, we find that the portion extracted above from thes .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... atter to the original authority with the directions that adequate enquiry/tests be got conducted through technically qualified persons/laboratories/agency to examine the factual accuracy of the contention of the respondents in this behalf as submitted by the learned Advocate above. After the correct facts in this behalf are ascertained and kept on record, the learned Assistant Commissioner shall proceed to pass a speaking order after hearing the respondents afresh. In this de novo proceedings the respondents shall be at liberty to submit any additional evidence with respect to this process of manufacture before the learned Assistant Commissioner, which he shall duly consider. 9. At this point learned Counsel submits that such an exercise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates