2000 (4) TMI 256

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g, Member (J)]. The appellants filed these appeals against the Order-in-Original dated 29-4-1991 passed by the Collector of Central Excise. In the impugned order the demand was confirmed invoking the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act and penalties were also imposed on the appellants. 2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, submits that the impugned order is pas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion. 3. Ld. SDR, appearing on behalf of the revenue submits that the only some corrections and verifications, were done in the re-investigation. He, therefore, submits, that there is no force in the arguments of the appellants, and he reiterated the fidings of adjudicating authority. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The grievance of the appellant is that, after filing their reply to show cause notice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X