The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY ...

Reassessment Notices Invalidated Due to Time Limitation Breach, Tribunal Quashes Proceedings Under Section 148

April 21, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week period specified in the show cause notice, rendering the 28.07.2022 notice invalid. For AY 2015-16, the notice was issued beyond the six-year limitation period, expiring on 31.03.2022. Consequently, the tribunal quashed both reassessment notices and subsequent proceedings as bad in law, dismissing the revenue's grounds of appeal and upholding the limitation bar established by judicial precedents.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY ...

Reassessment Notices Invalidated Due to Time Limitation Breach, Tribunal Quashes Proceedings Under Section 148

April 21, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

HC held that the second Section 148 notice was issued beyond the statutory limitation period of four years from the end of AY 2016-17. The first Section 148 notice was...

HC determined the reassessment notice issued on 30.07.2022 was time-barred under Section 149(1). While TOLA provided AO twenty-nine days limitation period from...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Assessment order quashed due to breach of principles of natural justice. Standard Operating Procedure mandates seven days' response time to show cause notice, but...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument...

Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

The High Court quashed the impugned reassessment notices issued u/s 148, holding that the reassessment action was barred by limitation u/s 149(1) read with the First...

Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement, and failure to comply with it renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The High Court has consistently held that Section...

Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 barred by limitation - Though the notice u/s 148(2) was first published in the newspaper on 09.12.2017 which was beyond the...

Maintainability of petition seeking initiation of CIRP against Personal Guarantor/Respondent - invocation of Bank guarantee and time limitation - The case involved an...

HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

Quick Updates: