TMI Blog2001 (1) TMI 368X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r No. C-II/3202, dated 17-11-1999 disposing of the appeal filed by Shri Mohanlal Hirachand Jain, the Tribunal had reduced the quantum of fine prescribed for redemption of the car and also reduced the quantum of penalty imposed on the appellant. The case was remanded back to the jurisdictional officer to decide the aspect of the liability to confiscation of the Indian currency. In the last paragrap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d to follow the direction of the Judiciary. This is a case where strong action should be taken on the concerned officers. Unfortunately, the Tribunal lacks this authority. In terms of Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, I direct the concerned Addl. Commissioner to complete the adjudication proceedings within one month from the receipt of this order after giving an opportunity to the appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|