9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (8) TMI 575X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Respondent. [Order per : G.N. Srinivasan, Member (J)]. These two applications for stay when came up for hearing, it was felt that the appeals themselves could be disposed of as the question involved in these appeals lie in a narrow compass. This was done, with the consent of both the sides and after waiving pre-deposit. 2. The appellants in their memoranda of appeals state that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... anuary, 2000 the Advocate of the appellant Shri S.N. Bhat returned the brief. On 19-1-2000, the appellants through their written communication informed the Adjudicating Authority of the changing of the Counsel due to illness of the erstwhile Counsel by certificate of post. In the said communication, the appellants requested for personal hearing. However, by the impugned order, the adjudicating aut ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der is bad in law. He states that the liability of the appellants would be of only Rs. 3.67 lakhs and the appellants have deposited Rs. 4 lakhs with the Adjudicating Authority. 5. The ld. DR while reiterating what is stated in the adjudication order states that ordinarily and normally the personal hearing should be given. But in this case, six times the appellants have asked for time. They have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... other of the Tribunal s (Single Member) judgment in the case of Sagar Dyeing Ptg. Mills P. Ltd. Anr. - 1999 (34) RLT 350. 8. We are of the view that the preposition of law profounded in these cases does not require any authority. In view of the above, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matters back to the Adjudicating Authority who shall allow the appellants to file their reply a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
