2001 (6) TMI 273

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. - A prayer has been made by the applicant that the Tribunal should rectify para 12 of the Final Order passed by it and cancel the penalty of Rs. one lakh inadvertently sustained. 2. In para 12 of the order, this Tribunal had held : "12. In the result, the appeal succeeds in part. The orders of confiscation of the seized yarn are upheld. The fine i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e in the case of CCE v. H.M.M. Ltd. Since there was confiscation of goods, penalty was sustainable in law. Thus, we do not find any merit in the application filed for rectification of mistake. The application is, therefore, rejected. The appellants have also filed a Misc. application for directing the authorities below to refund Rs. 8 lakhs deposited by them for hearing the appeal which has since .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X