TMI Blog1981 (1) TMI 179X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion filed by one, U. V. Shenoy under section 433( e ) and ( f ) read with sections 434(1)( a ) and 439(1)( b ) of the Companies Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") praying for an order winding up the 1st respondent-company. It is petitioner's case that the 1st respondent-company owes a sum of Rs. 33,490.55 in respect of certain items of goods supplied by him to the company. It is unnece ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itioner, his contract to supply link panels to the Indian Telephone Industries was cancelled and, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled to his prayer. The parties were permitted to file documents and mark the same by consent. Oral evidence of the petitioner as well as the managing director of the 1st respondent-company in respect of their respective stands was also recorded by me. On careful ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|