Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2002 (8) TMI 315

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nces and cleared by it without payment of duty in terms of exemption contained in Notification 203/92 had been sold by it to 26 firms. It therefore proposed to recover duty from the importer, proposed penalty on it, its director and on the alleged buyers of the product and the custom house agent who was concerned with the clearance of the goods. 2. The notice was made answerable to the Commissioner of Customs at Kandla. This Commissioner, however, did not pass any orders on the matter. The seven hearings that were scheduled by him were all adjourned for one reason or another. Subsequently, by order dated 24-8-2000, the Chief Commissioner of Customs at Ahmedabad passed orders directing the Commissioner of Customs at Ahmedabad to adjudicate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssued notice would have been within their rights in asking the Commissioner at Ahmedabad to hear them once again. We are therefore really concerned with the one adjournment that the Commissioner at Ahmedabad refused this appellant. We are of the view that the reason advanced for the adjournment, that the counsel was busy with the Tribunal in a matter which was already fixed, was not preverse or unacceptable not to have been granted. We therefore think that these appellants before us should be given an opportunity by the Commissioner of being heard. 5. The departmental representative then points out that the other 27 appellants had been heard by the Commissioner at Kandla and there is no justification in their matters to go back for adjudi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which was competent to transfer a matter for adjudication under Section 4 of the Act. It was today put to the parties that the bench might not find it possible to agree with the view expressed in that decision. Today, all the counsels for the appellants stated that they would not raise this issue of jurisdiction before the Commissioner at Ahmedabad to whom the matter would have to be remanded. 7. Having regard to the amount of time that has expired in the matter, we would like the Commissioner to adjudicate upon the matter without undue delay, noting the assurances given by the counsels for the appellants that they will not unnecessarily seek adjournment and will co-operate in the expeditious disposal of the matter. 8. The appeals are .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates