Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1994 (5) TMI 197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rief is that they have purchased the aforesaid land, vide registered sale deed executed on October 25, 1980 and registered on October 30, 1980, for a total consideration of Rs. 22, 000 from the said company and Shri Roop Singh the managing director of the said company had executed and got registered the sale deed in favour of the petitioners on receiving the consideration before the Sub-Registrar. The official liquidator has filed a reply contesting this petition. It has been pleaded that no valid sale deed has been executed on behalf of the company in favour of the petitioners and thus the petitioners have not become the owners of the property in question. It appears that in the English translation of the sale deed which was in Hindi l .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... irector of the company was legally entitled to sell the land of the company on behalf of the company then the sale made in favour of the petitioners has to be given effect to. It is true that in the sale deed there is no reference to any power given to the managing director on the basis of any resolution passed by the board of directors of the company. The minutes book of the company is not available with the official liquidator and there is no evidence brought on the record by the petitioners to prove that in fact any such resolution had been passed conferring any powers on the managing director to sell or dispose of the immovable property, i.e. , the land, in question belonging to the company. Learned counsel for the official liquidato .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n behalf of the board. Unless and until the board of directors had restrained the managing director from performing any particular act or function in the management of the business of the company, the vast powers given to the managing director to manage the affairs of the company would include disposing of and selling properties of the company. One of the businesses of the company being colonisation, the managing director, is my opinion, had the power to sell the land belonging to the company to any one for consideration. So it was not necessary that any specific resolution ought to have been passed by the board of directors to give power to the managing director for carrying out the business of the company. It is mentioned in the affidav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lid. In Burton and Deakin Ltd., In re [1977] 1 All ER 631 (Ch D), it was held that if a particular disposition falling within the powers was necessary or expedient in the interests of the company, and if the court considered that the reasons given were such as an intelligent and honest man could reasonably hold, the court would normally sanction the disposition. The court would not, except in the case of proven bad faith or other exceptional circumstances, interfere with the discretion conferred on the directors by a company's articles of association even if a winding up petition had been presented. In Kamani Metallic Oxides Ltd, v. Kamani Tubes Ltd. [1984] 56 Comp. Cas. 19, the Bombay High Court, while construing the provisions o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates