9911796707
TMI Blog1987 (2) TMI 474X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sh, Senior Advocate (N.R. Khaitan, Praveen Kumar and Kumkum Sen, Advocates, with him), for the respondent. -------------------------------------------------- The judgment of the Court was delivered by M.P. THAKKAR, J.-The High Court has repelled the challenge made to an arbitration award rendered by an umpire by its judgment under appeal. The dispute arose in the context of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in favour of the respondent. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the award is a non-speaking award which does not contain reasons and therefore it is invalid. It is true that the question whether a non-speaking award is valid or not has been referred to a larger Bench and the question is still wide open. However, it is unnecessary to refer the present matter to a larger Bench fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nditions were subject to the sales tax being paid extra in case sales tax liability came into existence and Accordingly there was no error apparent on the face of the award. We think that the view taken by the High Court is unexceptionable. We, therefore, confirm the order passed by the High Court and dismiss the appeal. There will be no order as to costs. The security furnished by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
