Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2001 (12) TMI 713

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ined therein namely that the units were closed and that in one case Counsel for the applicant misplaced the appeal file. 2. We now take up the stay applications and appeals. 3. All the above appeals involve a common issue and are hence heard together and disposed off by this common order, after waiving the requirement of pre-deposit since the issue in dispute stands settled by the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Sawan Mal Shibumal Steel Rolling Mills v. CCE, Chandigarh [2001 (127) E.L.T. 46 (T-LB) = 2001 (42) RLT 75]. 4. The appellants are manufacturers of hot re-rolled products of non-alloy steel by operating hot steel re-rolling mill. They are liable to pay duty at compounded rates in terms of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in parameters and even after reduction in annual capacity. It is the contention of the appellants, based upon the Larger Bench decision cited (supra) that Rule 5 which permits adoption of actual production of 1996-97 does not apply in all cases of change in annual capacity on account of change in machinery, and it is their contention that it is Rule 4(2) of the Rules that will be applicable in a case of change in annual capacity. 5. Learned DR reiterated the findings of the adjudicating authority that Rule 5 will continue to govern the situation where there is a change in capacity due to parameters and is not confined as to only cases where there is no change. 6. We have carefully considered the rival submissions. We find that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ;                                                                                    ANNEXURE 'A' Sr. No. Name of the Party COD/Stay Petition/ Appeal No. Demand of Duty Confirmed Amount for which Stay Application is made Is there any change in parameter Date of intimation of change in Parameter Original ACP as per formula AC .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3140.217 975.905 2452.612 E/913/2001-Mum. 7. M/s. Sains Steels Re-rolling Mill E/Stay-1061/2001-Mum. 5,99,450.00 2,59,006.00 Yes 23-6-1998 3564.757 3564.757 1141.076 2524.000 E/1956/2001-Mum. 8. M/s. Shivam Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. E/Stay-1084/2001-Mum. 12,20,454.00 11,18,324.00 Yes 7-11-1997 3841.784 3841.784 1182.087 4844.725 E/1077/2001-Mum. 9. M/s. Navyug Steel Industries E/COD-744/2001-Mum.                 E/Stay-1503/2001-Mum. 1,57,107.00 69,607.00 Yes 30-7-1999 3368.633 3368.633 1010.000 1795.500 E/1675/2001-Mum.                 10. Ganesh Steel Rolling Mill E/Stay-831/2001-Mum. 10,73,168.00 10,73,168.00 Yes 23 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates