2002 (11) TMI 382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. Revenue has filed this Appeal being aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Commissioner holding that the process undertaken by the assessee in regard to making Chandeliers was a process of manufacture and therefore, duty was payable on Chandeliers. 2. Arguing the case for the respondent Shri B.L. Narsimhan, learned Counsel submits that Revenue has only chall .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat the case was remanded with the direction that calculation of quantum of demand for the subsequent period has been left to the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner Central Excise and that the jurisdictional Commissioner of Central Excise should discuss all the submissions made by the appellant and then pass a self-contained speaking order in accordance with law. Learned DR further submits that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er has given a finding. The only finding that has been agitated by Revenue is whether the process of making chandeliers amounts to manufacture. There is no dispute that this is not a process of manufacture and hence we find that since this issue has not been agitated by the respondents, therefore, we have nothing to say but to uphold the finding of the Commissioner that the process of making chand .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X