2003 (5) TMI 296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rawal, Member (T)]. M/s. PGO Processors Pvt. Ltd. have filed the present Appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 442/2002, dated 24-6-2002 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected their claim for refund of duty. 2. Shri K.K. Anand, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants manufacture processed fabrics on job work basis; that on insistence by the Department they started paying dut .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ur. The learned Advocate, further mentioned that the show cause notice has so far not been adjudicated upon by the Adjudicating Authority. Learned Advocate also emphasized that the issue regarding payment of duty by a job worker on processed fabrics stands settled by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Ujagar Prints v. Union of India - 1989 (39) E.L.T. 493 and as such the Appellants a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X