2003 (3) TMI 530

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Petitioner. M. Ravindran, H. Banerjee, V. Ramasubramanian and Senthil Jagdesan for the Respondent. ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The first respondent as an administrator of a company under winding-up proceedings before the Company Judge had filed Company Application No. 260/02 in Company Petition No. 130 of 1990 seeking a direction to the petitioner herein to hand-over .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... late Bench of the High Court at Madras in O.S.A. No. 269 of 2002. It is seen from the impugned judgment that the High Court confirmed the directions issued by the learned Single Judge. Based on the consent of parties, it noted in its impugned order : "Learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as the Administrator and the Learned Counsel of the Lessee appeared today. They agreed for the terms and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... learned Company Judge, we notice that after discussing the material on record he has held that the transactions in favour of the petitioner herein in regard to the property in question do not have any legal sanctity and that the same were entered into one year after institution of the Company Petition, hence, that is liable to be struck down under section 531A of the said Act. This finding of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X