2006 (3) TMI 340

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed to quash the proceedings in S.T.C. Nos. 1 of 2001 to 6 of 2001, 94 of 2001, 95 of 2001, C.C. Nos. 243 of 2001 to 254 of 2001, and C.C. Nos. 279 of 2001 to 287 of 2001 on the file of the Special Judge, Economic Offences Court, Hyderabad. 2. None appears for the petitioner. Perused the grounds of criminal petition. 3. The grounds urged are that the offences are not continuous offences .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ended that the registered office of the petitioner s company is situated at Hyderabad only which was described in the array of parties and therefore, he prays to dismiss the petition. 5. Whether the petitioner s company has its registered office at Mumbai or at Hyderabad is required to be decided by the concerned court and the same cannot be decided at this stage in view of the fact that in th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X