9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (6) TMI 352X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Pasayat, J. - Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench granting interim protection to Respondent No. 1. 2. Briefly stated factual scenario is as follows: A show-cause notice was issued by the appellant on 9-5-2008 requiring the Respondent No. 1 to show cause as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on 5-6-2008 staying the operation and the enforcement of the order dated 4-6-2008 impugned before it till further orders of the High Court. The High Court has also indicated that since objection was taken to certain activities of respondent No. 1, they were directed to complete all the requisite formalities and follow the directions of the present appellant from time to time. The writ petitioner ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se notice dated 9-5-2008 and order dated 4-6-2008 it is submitted that several illegalities have been committed and there is total lack of transparency in the functioning of respondent No. 1. Several serious infirmities have been elaborately dealt with in the show-cause notice and order dated 4-6-2008. 4. Learned senior counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1 on the other hand submitted that had a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e have been followed in the present ease. But an opportunity of hearing would be appropriate, because of nature of proceedings. It shall not be construed as if we have stated so to be applicable in all cases. Because of the peculiar nature of the case, we are directing to be so done. We, therefore, direct that Respondent No. 1 shall appear without any further notice before the designated authority ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
