2004 (3) TMI 605

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Respondent. [Order]. - It was alleged against the appellant that they had taken Modvat credit on the strength of invoices, which were not authenticated by the proper officer as per the provisions of Rule 57G(3)(i). The said invoices were issued by the dealer of imported goods. It was also alleged that the appellants ought to have ensured before taking the credit of duty, that the duty paying .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Chemical Industries reported in 1999 (105) E.L.T. 294 (T) it is claimed that credit cannot be denied, as the assessee himself has not contravened any provisions. 4. I note that the appellants reliance on the aforesaid judgments is misplaced. This is a case of grant of Modvat credit with reference to the invoices issued by the dealer. It is a mandatory requirement under Rule 57G(3)(i) that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X