2004 (3) TMI 645

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order]. - This is a ROM filed by the party against the Final Order Nos. 103 to 105/2004, dated 23-1-2004 [2004 (166) E.L.T. 241 (T)]. The appeal filed by the party was allowed in respect of 10 items noted in the order pertaining to the impugned goods, so the Revenue-appeal was rejected. Now, they have come with an application seeking rectification of mistakes said to have occurred in Page 5 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d that there is no mistake pointed out in the Final Order that is in finding portion of the order. Only one word is supposed to have been mis-typed. Instead of typing Parlour Games it has been typed as Model . The sentence should be read in the way in which the ld. Counsel requires it to be done substituting the word Parlour Games with Model . The rectification to that extent is allowed. - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X