2005 (4) TMI 339

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order]. Heard Shri K. Chatterjee, ld. Consultant for the applicant, Shri Raj Kumar Jaiswal and Shri K. Sanyal, ld. JDR for the Revenue. 2. Shri Chatterjee submits that the statement of facts which has been sent by the Tribunal to the Hon ble Kolkata High Court may be enlarged in respect of Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal Haider Ali. He submits that the owner of the seized metal scraps is Rajesh K .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... will reveal that it has been contested by Shri Raj Kumar Jaiswal and no other respondent/applicant has contested the reference made before the Hon ble High Court. He further submits that Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal and Haider Ali have not filed any Miscellaneous Application before this Tribunal. Therefore, the statement cannot be enlarged or submitted to the Hon ble High Court. He, therefore, submits th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... plication, the Appellate Tribunal shall, within one hundred and twenty days of the receipt of such direction, draw up a statement of the case and refer it to the High Court. In the present case, the Hon ble High Court has directed to submit the statement of facts in respect of Raj Kumar Jaiswal which has already been sent by this Tribunal. This Tribunal has no power to enlarge the statement of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X