TMI Blog2005 (6) TMI 319X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ments and to make payment to the bank and failed to fake delivery of the goods which were therefore shifted to customs bonded warehouse. 2. We have heard both sides. 3. We find that the adjudicating authority has recorded detailed findings as to why the appellants' request cannot be entertained, as under :- "From the facts on record., it is evident that the goods, in question, were shipped from XINGANG, CHINA vide bill of lading No. ClSNNSA 300407 dated 21-6-2002, to Nhava Sheva, India. The B/L mentions following details : Issued by M/s. CHINA SHIPPING CONTAINER LINKS CO. LTD. (1) Shipper : Shanxi Dimine International Trading Co. Ltd. 110, Narth Taoyuan Road, Taiyuan Shanxi, China (2) Consignee : To order of Bank of I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... THANE - 401402 Pl correct the m/f ur end and release cargo to once against the O B/L showing "Megabyte International Pte. Ltd., 60 Albert Street, 10-09, Singapore - 189 969" as ntg. Besides pls collect all charges from these amendment at your end" Na Liwei China Shipping ----------- (ii) The Steamer Agents, M/s. Merchant Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. issued a letter dated 16th August, 2002 to the Manager, Punjab Conware, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (custodians) which is reproduced below : Customs Examination Order Dated 16th Aug. 2002 To The Manager Punjab Conware, JNPT Dear Sir, MV : CSCL BENOA IGM No. 6416 Voy No. 0 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... N For Merchant Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. - Sd- As Agents only (iv) A copy of the Original Bill of Lading No. CTSNNSA 300407, which is on record, shows the following endorsement on the reverse side : Play/Deliver to the order of Megabytes International Pvt. Ltd. For BANK OF INDIA Manager DELIVERY TO THE ORDER OF MARSINA ENTERPRISES MEGABYTES INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. authorised signatory FOR MARSINA ENTERPRISES - sd- Auth. Sign. CHA - 11/319 P. CAWASJI & CO IDA Mansion 18 Vaju Kotak Marg Bombay - 400 001 For P. CAWASJI & CO - SD- Auth. Sign. From all these documents, it is clear that th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he original documents might have reached the Indian importer by some other means may be directly from the suppliers. However, I would refrain from making any categorical observation as to how the original bill of lading was produced to the steamer agents who issued the delivery order in favour of the importers M/s. Marsina Enterprises and the circumstances leading to the delivery of the goods. Since a delivery order was issued by the agents and the custodians allowed the delivery of the said goods on the basis of the said documents, there remains no scope to doubt these exchange of documents and consequently the ownership of the goods. On the particular issue of ownership/title of the goods, I intend to refer to the observations made by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... over of their letter dated 24-11-2003. He has also noted that the DRI had already found that the importers were non-existent, that they had imported various goods duty free against advance licences obtained and had diverted them into the local market for sale, thus rendering the goods liable to confiscation under Section 111(o) and that in the present case also, the goods were originally intended to be cleared against the advance licences and it was only after commencement of investigation by the DRI that the goods were warehoused and advance licence details sought to be utilised were struck down. On this basis, he has held that the goods although not yet cleared were liable to confiscation. The appellants rely upon the judgment of the Apex ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|