2005 (2) TMI 740

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. - Heard both sides. 2. The Revenue filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Show cause notice was issued to the respondents on the ground that they were clearing the goods with the brand name of others and goods were cleared without payment of duty. The Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order confirmed the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sioner (Appeals) has wrongly accepted the appeal filed by the respondents. 3. The contention of respondent is that in the statement of Shri Madhusudan Bhasin, authorised signatory admitted that they had cleared certain number of pieces with the brand names of others and the demand has been confirmed and the respondents are not contesting that demand. In respect of the other items, the contention .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X