2006 (5) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, for the Appellant. Shri P.K. Katiyar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - This application is made seeking invocation of powers under Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules. 2. Vide order dated 1-12-2005, the Tribunal allowed an appeal of the importers, directing the clearance of the goods without fine and penalty. The appellants thereafter have approach .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... endorsed to the Chairman of Central Board of Excise and Customs with a hope that a look into the matter may be called for and necessary clarifications from the Commissioner be obtained as to the reasons the order has not been implemented. Why the assessees are to move from pillar to post in getting their dues as per the norms? is a question that has to be addressed and suitably decided to ensure a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d to the Chief Departmental Representative who is required to take up the matter with the concerned authorities in the CBEC to ensure that the orders of this Tribunal are enforced. If the orders are not to be complied and the Revenue is aggrieved, they are always free to take up the same in appeal, in the present case, there is no material available and the learned Advocate for the appellant makes .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X