2005 (9) TMI 568

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Respondent. [Order]. - The Revenue is in appeal. 2. This is a case where the Department demanded duty from the Respondent on the rejected goods at the enhanced value on the basis that the Respondent had re-packed and re-lablled and sold to its customer at the enhanced price. The fact of the case are that the Respondent had placed an order for supply of bulk drug i.e. Cetirizine Dihyd .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by the Additional Commissioner, confirming the duty in demand. On filing appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), the Order-in-Original was set aside. Aggrieved by the same, the Department is in appeal on the ground that the goods were cleared after availing greater amount of credit and mis-declaring as inputs to have been cleared under Rule 57F2 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. As per the sai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... therefore, seen that if the appellant is made to pay the duty, which has been demanded from them, the supplier of these inputs, namely, M/s. Koran and M/s. Hetro Drugs will be eligible for much higher amount of credit of duty than what was suffered by these goods at the time of their sale to the appellant. 4. The reasons assigned by the Commissioner (Appeals) in setting aside the order-in-o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X