9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (1) TMI 372X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... der per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides and perused record. 2. The appellant claimed refund of light house charges amounting to about Rs. 13 lakhs, paid during the period August to October 2002, in regard to coastal run vessels. The claim was filed on 4-2-2003 before the Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Kakinada. The ground taken was that there was an exemption from light hou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the Customs Authorities were not legally competent to decide the refund application. It is being pointed out that under Section 15, Light House Act 1927 disputes about "whether light house dues are payable" are to be heard and determined by a Presidency Magistrate or the Magistrate of First Class having jurisdiction at the place where the dispute ar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... recognizes Customs Collector as the proper officer. Section 19 which refers to refund of excess payment does not specifically stipulates proper officer. However, since refund is only incidental to collection and recovery, it is to be held that proper officer for refund of excess payment under the Act would also be Custom Collector. A contrary view would lead to a vacuum in the legal arrangements. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
