9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (8) TMI 503X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y, they are only part of CFLs. The Revenue has no case that anti-dumping duty is leviable under N/N. 138/2002-Cus. ibid on parts of CFLs imported from China - appeal allowed. - C/584/2006 - 963/2007 - Dated:- 2-8-2007 - S/Shri P.G. Chacko, P. Karthikeyan, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri A.P. Datar, Sr. Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri B.L. Meena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -cause notice to the importer and in adjudication thereof, the learned Commissioner demanded anti-dumping duty of Rs. 36,22,900/- from the party in terms of the aforesaid Notification and also ordered confiscation of the goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act (with option for redemption against fine of Rs. 3 lakhs), besides imposing penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs on the party under Section 112(a) o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l text of the order passed in the case of M/s. Anchor Daewoo Inds. Ltd. reported in 2007 (214) E.L.T. 230 (T) = 2007-TIOL-752-CESTAT-AHM. 3. Learned SDR has reiterated the findings of the Commissioner. He submits that the goods imported by the appellants is a CFL without choke and plastic end-cap. 4. We have seen samples of the goods imported by the appellants, which are sealed glass tubes. It ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
