2006 (12) TMI 426

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cates, for the Appellant. Smt. R. Bhagya Devi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J)]. - After examining the records and hearing both sides, we are of the view that the appeals require to be finally disposed of at this stage. Accordingly, after dispensing with predeposit, we take up the appeals. 2. A show-cause notice was issued by the DRI to the appellants, w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eposit expired, the appellate authority dismissed the appeals for non-compliance with Section 129E without examining the case on merits. Hence the present appeals. 3. Ld. counsel for the appellants has rightly pointed out that the Addl. Commissioner of Customs (Exports) had no jurisdiction to adjudication upon the SCN and, therefore, the appellate authority ought to have remanded the case to the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X