9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (1) TMI 484X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. As per the interim stay order dated 10-10-2006, the appellant was required to deposit 50% of the amount payable under the impugned order within eight weeks from that date failing which the appeal was to stand dismissed. Accordingly, since the amount was not deposited, the appeal stood dismissed on 12-12-2006. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... equiring pre-deposit of 50% of the amount payable under the impugned order within eight weeks, another Bench by order dated 23-11-2006, referred the appeals raising identical issue to a Larger Bench finding itself unable to agree with the ratio of the decision in Favourite Food Products v. CCE, Rajkot, reported in 2001 (127) E.L.T. 131 (Mum. Trib.), on which reliance was placed in the present appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ch has referred the other appeals which were listed for final hearing to a Larger Bench, it does not in any manner dilute the ratio of the decision in Favourite Food Products (supra) on the basis on which the interim order was made, while also resting the order on the fact that the applicant in its initial declaration had classified the product under heading 1904.10. Referring those appeals to a L ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
