9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (12) TMI 396X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t arise out of a common order of Commissioner (Appeals) No. RS/ 149/SRT-I/06, dt. 11-12-2006. 2. Heard ld. SDR. In respect of respondent M/s. Dinesh Enterprises, a written submission has been made enclosing the order of the Tribunal No. A/2670/WZB/AHD/07, dt. 25-9-2007 in their appeal against the very same order of the Commissioner (Appeals). None appeared for the other respondents. 3. The rel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... present appeals by the Department relate to the portion of the order by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the demand of duty from the shop keepers. The relevant portion of the Commissioner (Appeals) order is reproduced below : (iii) On going through the case records and written submission made on behalf by the appellant, it is seen that since goods seized in the appellant shop wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he procurer/ trader of the excisable, goods. Further, the Supreme Court in the Ujagar Prints case 1989 (38) E.L.T. 535 (S.C.) has held that in the case of processing houses, they become liable to pay excise duty not because they are the owners of the goods but because they cause the manufacture of the goods. . The similar view has been taken by the Supreme Court in case of Empire Ind. Ltd. 1985 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
