9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (9) TMI 695X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ]. This appeal filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal No. RKR(196)40/07 dated 25-9-2007. 2. Heard both sides, considered the submissions made and perused the records. 3. The Revenue is in appeal against the reduction of penalty by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the respondents. The main contention of the Revenue is that the Commissioner (Appeals) in his Order-in-appeal has redu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n of equivalent amount of penalty of Rs. 16,250/-. 5. After considering the submission made by both sides, the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has come to the following conclusion : - I have carefully gone through the records of this appeal, the written as well as oral submissions of the appellants made in their appeal memorandums and in course of personal hearing. It is seen that the departme ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... circular, issued on the subject. It can be noticed from the above reproduced portion of the order that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has relied upon the various decision of the Tribunal in coming to the conclusion. Further, I find that the show cause notice, which has been issued to the respondent, was seeking to impose penalty on the respondent under Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
