9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (9) TMI 704X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... karna, Jt. Commissioner and Rajender Kumar, Assistant Commissioner, for the Respondent. [Order]. - This second-appeal was heard on 15-9-2009 in the presence of the appellant and the respondents represented by Shri Avinash Pushkarna, Joint commissioner and Shri Rajender Kumar, Assistant Commissioner. 2. Appellant's RTI-application dated 4-2-2009 contained the following requests : "Details ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r Kumar on 26-2-2009 and the Appellate Authority decided the first-appeal on 16-4-2009. 4. In the second appeal, appellant has queried the rationale based on which the Appellate Authority declined to disclose the requested information. Appellant pointed out that the ratio of the orders of the Commission cited by the CPIO and the Appellate Authority did not apply in the present matter as the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (1) of the Act. But, in matters in which enquiries have been completed and closed. Section 8(1)(h) surely is not attracted. In this case, even Section 8(1)(g) cannot be said to be attracted, as, as pointed out by the appellant, similar information has been provided to him by CBI, who investigated the case against Shri S.N. Bussi. 6. In view of the above, on balance, I am in agreement with th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
