9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (12) TMI 597X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ertain number of Members and the Members are identifiable by their name and signature. That page also does not indicate whether there was a decision of the Committee to appeal against an order and whether that order was not legal and proper - appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - E/52/2007-SM(BR) - 66/2009-SM(BR)(PB) - Dated:- 24-12-2008 - Shri D.N. Panda, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the ld. DR submits that that was the signature of the ld. CCE, Allahabad. The reason why a public servant, who signs a document has not stated his name is well known to that authority. The unnamed signature also indicates the dates 21-11. This particular page in page No. 2 3 nowhere states whether there was any Committee to take a decision for seeking appeal remedy coming to a primary conclusion ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urat-I v. Shree Ganesh Dyeing Printing Works reported in 2008 (232) E.L.T. 775 (Guj.) = 2008 (89) RLT 549 (Guj.) and CCE C, Surat-II v. Siddharth Petro Products Ltd. Anr. reported in 2008 (232) E.L.T. 784 (Guj.) = 2009 (13) S.T.R. 18 (Guj.) = 2008 (89) RLT 554 (Guj.). 4. Observing aforesaid legal infirmities, Misc. Application of the Revenue is dismissed. 5. In view of disposal of the Mi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
