2008 (12) TMI 618

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t. [Order]. Heard both sides. 2. Shri N.K. Chowdhury, learned Advocate appearing for the Appellants states that in this case, the Original Order dated 19-11-05 was received by the two Appellants respectively on 12-12-05 and 30-12-05. They preferred a joint appeal on 17-2-06, which has been dismissed on 28-4-06 (issued on 26-7-06) by the lower Appellate Authority. Subsequently, the Appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pre-deposit the entire amount of penalty. This Order was passed ex parte as the Appellants were not represented. However, surprisingly, the learned D.R. who appeared that day did not point out that the penalties imposed were higher than that nor any application for modification of the Order has been filed by the concerned Commissioner. Shri N.K. Chowdhury, learned Advocate appearing for the Appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X