2009 (2) TMI 689

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. Revenue filed this Appeal against the impugned Order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise & Service Tax, Ranchi. The Commissioner allowed the refund of Central Excise Duty on the ground that incidence of duty has not been passed on to the customers. 3. Learned S.D.R. has relied on the decision in the cas .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... duty was paid by them accordingly, whereas the goods actually cleared under the respective invoice were valued at Rs. 5,52,950.00 only. This mistake was pointed out by the customer of the Respondents and the said customer paid the duty on the basis of value of the goods received by them as per contract. This is evident from a letter dated 29-3-06 written by the customer of the Respondents, M/s. B .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... including duty was made as per the correct value of goods. In the case of self-assessment, if the duty of the higher amount has been paid by mistake and the same has not been recovered, the refund is permissible under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The case of the Revenue is that the assessment was finalised. But there is nothing on record in support of this argument. In these circumstanc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X