1955 (2) TMI 8

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ommercial Tax Department to restrain them from enforcing an order of assessment already made and which had become final, under which the petitioner was liable to sales tax assessed under the provisions of the General Sales Tax Act, 1939, and the rules framed thereunder. The petitioner was a licensed tanner. For the assessment year 1950-51 he was assessed on a turnover of Rs. 24,22,622-14-5. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... validity of the assessment confirmed by the Commercial Tax Officer, and having no adequate explanation for that failure, the petitioner should not be permitted to invoke the jurisdiction vested in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution to grant in its discretion a writ of certiorari. Apart from the fact that the petitioner failed to avail himself of the remedy, there is also the consider .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he petitioner is a licensed dealer, and the liability of an unlicensed dealer to pay sales tax, even though rule 16(5) has been held to be ultra vires, does not really arise for determination in these proceedings. Another contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was that rule 15, which provided for provisional assessment on a monthly basis in the case of a licensed tanner was also ultr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X