Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1955 (11) TMI 25

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ware of this liability of Smt. Maina Sundari to pay the sales tax. After the purchase the petitioners put the mill in order and started working it. After the petitioners had started working the mill, they received a notice from the Tahsildar, Sales Tax, Kanpur, demanding the sales tax of the previous five years amounting to Rs. 13,710-12-0. The peti- tioners filed objections and submitted that they were not liable for the payment of the tax and it was Smt. Maina Sundari who was liable for its payment. It is not known whether the objections were decided or not. But the Additional District Magistrate passed an order on the 9th July, 1955, directing the attachment of the machinery and the building of the mills in connection with the recovery o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Section 7 makes it obligatory for every dealer who is liable to pay the tax to submit such return or returns of his turnover of the pre- vious year or the assessment year, as the case may be, and in such form as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) says that if the assessing authority is satisfied that the returns submitted under sub-section (1) are correct and complete he shall assess the tax on the basis of the returns. According to sub-section (3) if no return is submitted or the return submitted is found to be incorrect or incomplete, the assessing authority can determine the turnover of the dealer to the best of his judgment and assess the tax on the basis thereof. Section 8 lays down that this tax shall be paid in such manner and in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is trying to recover money from them which they are not liable to pay. The demand of this amount is likely to interfere with the fundamental right of the petitioners to carry on their trade. If the sales tax depart- ment for some reason which has not been disclosed in this case thinks that the sale deed is invalid, it may bring a suit for setting aside the sale deed. So long as the sale deed stands it is obvious that the sales tax assessed on the previous owner cannot be recovered from the petitioners. The validity of the sale deed has not been challenged in the present proceedings. For the above reasons, this petition is allowed and a writ of mandamus shall be issued to the respondents Nos. 1 and 2 restraining them from recovering the a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates