Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1966 (9) TMI 125

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 959, the Commercial Tax Officer determined his turnover of manufactured goods at Rs. 23,625 and Rs. 53,375 respectively; out of these, he excluded Rs. 13,000 and Rs. 21,000 respectively for the two periods mentioned above as being turnovers relating to sales of agricultural implements and thus exempted from taxation. In the appeal before the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, it was contended that the entire turnovers relating to manufactured goods were exempt from levy of sales tax as they relate to sale of agricultural implements. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes accepted that contention and allowed the exemption prayed for. Sometime thereafter the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, in exercise of his revisional power .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d the order of the Deputy Commissioner. Mr. Srinivasan confined his attack against the Commissioner's order to the extent he revised the order of the Commercial Tax Officer. According to Mr. Srinivasan, the Commissioner's power to revise the Commercial Tax Officer's order had been lost as the same had not been exercised within four years from the date of the Commercial Tax Officer's order. It may be noted that the Commercial Tax Officer assessed the assessee on 9th August, 1960. The Commissioner issued notice under section 21(2) of the Act on 3rd March, 1964, and the impugned order was made on 19th February, 1965. If it is the date of the order that is relevant under section 21(3) of the Act, then Mr. Srinivasan is right in his contention t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... under this Act, the power of the Deputy Commissioner under clause (i) of sub-section (1) and that of the Commissioner under clause (i) of sub-section (2) shall be exercisable only within a period of four years from the date of order, which was communicated to the assessee." Hence we have to see, on what date the Commissioner exercised his powers under sub-section (2) of section 21. What then is the scope of the power of the Commissioner under section 21(2). Is the exercise of that power merely means passing of an order which he thinks fit? The power conferred on the Commissioner under section 21(2) as could be gathered from its language includes three different facets, viz., (1) calling for the records mentioned therein, (2) examination o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates