2010 (2) TMI 999

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondent. ORDER Heard. Learned Advocate for the appellants states that the appellants company could not deposit the entire amount within the specified time and the matter was dismissed on that count on 16-9-2008. He further states that subsequently the appellants company deposited the required amount in terms of the stay order and, therefore, has moved the present application for resto .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the appeals nor it amounts to compliance of the conditions of the stay order. 3. It cannot be disputed that mere deposit of the amount after the specified period in terms of the order passed under proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would not entitle the appellants to seek restoration of the appeal which was dismissed on account of failure on the part of the appellants to com .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X