2009 (11) TMI 767

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... en produced on behalf of the Department to prove the contrary that appellants have either short paid the duty or they have been any way compensated by the Govt. of India and thereby they have enriched themselves at the cost of the Govt. revenue. Hence, we are of the view that the impugned order passed by the lower appellate authority reversing the order of the original authority is not sustainable .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... spect of the diverted quantities. 2. Ld. consultant Shri Masillamoney appearing for the appellants also states that they have not received any compensation by way of differential duty from the Govt. of India in respect of the free sale sugar diverted to levy sugar quota. 3. We find that the original authority after going through the case records has dropped the duty demand in view of adjustmen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X