2009 (11) TMI 767

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pondent. ORDER Heard both sides. During the period in dispute, the appellant-sugar mill was directed by the Director (Sugar Control), Ministry of Food and Consumer Affairs to divert impugned quantity of sugar from free sale quota and sell the same as levy sugar purely on loan basis. Subsequently, the appellants were compensated by diversion of equal quantity from the levy sugar quota to free sal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y have been any way compensated by the Govt. of India and thereby they have enriched themselves at the cost of the Govt. revenue. Hence, we are of the view that the impugned order passed by the lower appellate authority reversing the order of the original authority is not sustainable. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order and restore the order of the original authority. 5. Appeal is allowe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X