Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2009 (11) TMI 537

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2. The respondent herein submitted its return for the assessment year 1993-94 and in the return, it claimed certain deduction including the deduction under section 80HH of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) amounting to Rs. 7,44,639 contending that the undertaking is situate in Belgaum, which is treated as a backward area under notification No. S. O. 165(E) datedDecember 19, 1986. However, the Assessing Officer rejected the said contention by contending thatBelgaumtaluk has been excluded for the purpose of benefit under section 80HH of the Act and accordingly, passed an order of assessment onMarch 29, 1996. Being aggrieved by the said assessment order, the assessee preferred I. T. A. No. 41/BGM/96-97 on the file of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ubstantial question of law that arises for determination in this appeal is : Whether the finding of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, Panaji, confirming the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Belgaum, holding that Belgaum is a backward area as per the notification dated December 19, 1986, is contrary to law and perverse and arbitrary as to call for interference in this appeal ? 4. We answer the aforesaid substantial question of law in the negative against the Revenue for the following reasons. 5. The fact that the assessee is having manufacturing unit inBelgaum, is not in dispute. It is also not in dispute that the assessees of backward areas, who are entitled to claim benefit under secti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e contentions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and scrutinized the material on record. 8. It is clear from the notification datedDecember 19, 1986, declaring back- ward areas as referred to above that in respect of Districts of Belgaum, Bidar, Bijapur, no taluks have been excluded. However, in respect of Districts of Dharwad, Gulbarga, Mysore, North Kanara, South Kanara, Rai- chur, Tumkur, certain taluks of the said Districts have been excluded and in respect of Gulbarga District, taluks of Chittapur. Sedam andBelgaumhave been excluded. As the notification reads Gulbarga(excluding Chittapura taluk, Sedam taluk andBelgaumtaluk) what is excluded in the notifica- tion is Chittapur taluk, Sedam taluk andBelgaumtaluk of Gul .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates