Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2010 (9) TMI 386

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sent them for testing to CRCL, Textile Committee, (Ministry of Textile, Government of India) and to Government Central Textile Institute (GCTI). (c) As per report of CRCL dated 19-8-2003, the samples were composed wholly of textile multi filament yarn polyester. The test report suggested that end-use of samples should be ascertained by executive check. For ascertaining whether the samples contained any hazardous dyes, it was also recommended that the sample should be forwarded to Textile Committee, New Delhi for their opinion. The report of the CRCL was signed by Shri M.D. Mondal, Chemical Examiner. (d) The test report dated 19-8-03 of the Textile Committee reads as follows : 1. Identification of fibre     IS 667:1981     Wrap & Weft Polyester 2. Percentage Composition     Polyester 100 3. Whether staple/filament yarn     Warp & Weft Filament yarn   % Filament yarn 100 4. Whether  texturised Non-texturised     Warp & weft Non-texturised   % Non-texturised yarn 100 5. Whether woven/non -woven woven The report was signed by Shri C.R. Venkitachalam, Assistant Director (Laboratories .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... but only by technicians, no internal documents prepared by said technician were produced. Retest has been done even without the request for retesting from Customs authorities which is not permissible. The order of the Commissioner also refers to certain correspondence between the Member Secretary, Textile Committee, Mumbai and the Chief Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. The said communication has not been made available. The second report of Textile Committee is, thus, clearly an influenced report and based on extraneous consideration. The Commissioner's reasoning given for rejecting the first report of Textile Committee and accepting the second report of Textile Committee is erroneous. 4.3 He also submits that the report of GCTI, Kanpur which was in their favour has not been controverted. 4.5 Further, the Explanatory Notes to HSN does not prescribe any methodology for ascertaining as to whether the fabric is made of non-texturised filament yarn or texturised yarn. It does not prescribe any methodology for testing. The distinguishing criteria prescribed in Explanatory Notes to HSN like whether there are loops, parallel orientation, curls, crimps are ascertainable by visual ex .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that Smt. Anita Hazra, he submits that the first report of Textile Committee went on mis-conception that mingled and tangled yarn was not considered as texturised yarn as it was felt that the said yarn could not be texturised. Whereas subsequent to visit by a team of officers to several texturising units in Gurajart, the technological developments came to the notice and therefore, the retest was conducted suo motu and the first report was cancelled and the second report was sent to the Department. 5.7 He also submits that subsequent to visit by a team of officials of Textile Committee, revised guidelines have been issued on matters relating to testing of yarn as to whether the same is textured yarn or otherwise. 5.8 Taking us through to the Explanatory Notes to HSN of textured yarn relating to sub-heading 5402.31 to 5402.39, he claims that advance testing is required to distinguish the textured yarn from non-textured yarn and the second report of Textile Committee is following such method. The second report of Textile Committee is on the lines of report given by CRCL. These reports require to be accepted in preference to reports from Kanpur Laboratory which is basically a tr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ilaments in the yarn." 6.2 From a close reading of the same, it is noticed that the said notes contain distinguishing features between textured yarn or non-textured yarn. We do not agree with the contentions of the learned Jt. CDR that the said notes prescribed any method for testing the samples for determining whether the yarn is textured or not. 7. The submission of the learned Jt. CDR that the Textile Committee was a nominated agency for testing hazardous dyes and therefore, the samples sent to the said laboratory is understandable. Still, there is no explanation forthcoming as to why the samples were also sent to GCTL, Kanpur by the officers. The submission that the samples were sent to Kanpur Laboratory on the request of the party is not substantiated. Having chosen to send the samples to three different laboratories for testing, valid reason should be adduced for rejecting any report of the laboratories which is in favour of the party. 8.1 The Textile Committee is undisputedly a specialised agency. CRCL is like a general physician and that Textile Committee is like a kind of specialist on matters relating to textile and textile articles. That is why, in our .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by team of officers. The endorsement of the Quality Assurance Officer, the Director (Laboratory) of the second report cannot automatically invalidate the first report. Further, it is noticed that the first report of the Textile Committee the samples as 100% non-textured and the second report is diametrically opposite stating that the sample as 100% textured. Such a view in this particular case throws serious doubt about medical in which the test has been done by the Textile Committee. Notwithstanding the eminent status of the Textile Committee in matters relating to textile and textile articles, in the present case, the second report given by them do not instil our confidence in us. 8.3 Having held that the relied portions of HSN Notes have not prescribed methods for determining whether yarn is textured or non-textured yarn, we do not find any valid reason to disregard the report of GCTL which is in favour of the assessee. We have not been shown any reliable evidence that advance test is mandatory to decide whether the yarn is textured yarn or not. The cross-examination of the experts namely, Shri C.R. Venkitachalam, Assistant Director, Shri M.D. Mondal, Chemcial Examiner, Sh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates