TMI Blog2011 (4) TMI 31X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Prohibition, prohibiting the respondent from proceeding with the adjudication process, in File No.F.No.CAU/DRI/35/2009, pursuant to the show cause not ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... true spirit and in good faith. 4. The learned counsel Mr.K.Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan, appearing on behalf of the respondent, had submitted that the respondent shall return to the petitioner all the documents seized from the petitioner, which are not relied upon by the respondent, if they had not been given to the petitioner, till date. He had also submitted that the copies of all the docum ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ioner to substantiate the claims made by him. It is also made clear that the petitioner should cooperate, fully, in the adjudication process, which shall be conducted by the respondent, as per the relevant provisions of law, as expeditiously as possible. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|