2009 (1) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oner for Review of the Order not maintainable under the law and, therefore, the Review Petition is rejected - 1/2008 - - - Dated:- 13-1-2009 - Shri J. Khosla, JJ. REPRESENTED BY : M/s. L.S. Shetty Associates, Advocates, for the Appellant. M/s. Lakshmi Kumaran Sridharan, Advocates, Shri Bharat Raichandani, Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order]. Being aggrieved by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... unal, whereas it is silent in the Textiles Committee Act. Further, the ld. Counsel has submitted a catena of decisions :- 1. Patel Narshi Thakershi and Others v. Shri Pradyumansinghji Arjunsingji, reported in 1971 (3) SCC 844. 2. Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Central Government Industrial Tribunal Ors., reported in 1980 (Supp) SCC 420. 3. Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union v. Birla Cotton Sp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (SMT) Ors., reported in (2006) 4 SCC 78. 12. K. Ajit Babu v. Union of India, reported in (1997) 6 SCC 473. Some of these decisions discuss about the power of Review. Unless the power of Review is vested specifically under the Statute, the Tribunal cannot review its decision. The Textiles Cess Appellate Tribunal is the creature of Statute, it exercises its jurisdiction and functions as spe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X