9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (4) TMI 383X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... av Duggal, for the Respondent. [Judgment (Oral)]. - This writ petition has been filed, impugning the letter dated 27-2-2007 received by the petitioner, informing the petitioner that the Appellate Committee considered its request for waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount of Rs. 2 crores and found that a bank guarantee of Rs. 30 lacs would be justified. It was also communicated to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rs; . (c) Whether the Joint DGFT has accounted 100% export obligation on the basis of other supporting records filed by the petitioner. This remand order was also made in the context of the Circular No. 4/93 dated 4-3-1993. 3. The adjudicating authority had passed an order-in-original on 31-10-2005, after the said remand. It is against this order-in-original that a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , it was apparent that the adjudicating authority was to return a finding as to whether the imported material was disposed of by the petitioner before the export obligation was fulfilled. He submits that this assumes that the export obligation was fulfilled but the only contention was whether the imported material was disposed of before the same was done. The other issue was with regard to the man ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2007 is not an order by itself but there is an order on the file, the contents of which have been communicated by virtue of the letter dated 27-2-2007. Mr. Malhotra has brought the original file for the perusal of this Court. He read out the minutes of the hearing done before the appellate authority as well as the order passed on the file. There is no doubt that the order has been passed on the fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
