2011 (3) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Respondent. [Judgment per : N. Kumar, J.]. - This appeal is by the revenue challenging the order passed by the Tribunal, which has held that there is no corroborative evidence to sustain the charges of clandestine removal and therefore, the demand cannot be sustained. 2. Therefore, the substantial question of law if at all it arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the revenu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X