2011 (10) TMI 137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Consultant for Appellant Shri Rajendra Nagar, SDR for Respondent  Per :  Mr. B.S.V. Murthy; The refund claim of service tax paid on various services namely transport of goods by road, transport of goods by rail, agency charges and port charges and commission charges for export of goods has been rejected.  In respect of transport of goods by rail, the claim has been rejected on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tached. However, learned counsel submitted that they would satisfy the original adjudicating authority by producing the documents and seeks remand on this ground. This plea is to be accepted. 2. Further, the refund of service tax paid on Port service has been rejected on the ground that service provider was not authorized by the port. In this connection there are several decisions of the Tribunal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it would not be appropriate to disallow the credit. 4. The last issue involved is whether refund of service tax paid on services of Commission Agents located abroad is available or not. Learned counsel submits that the service received is for sales promotion of the goods manufactured by the appellant. There are several decisions taking a view that the service tax paid on Commission Agent service .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X