2009 (11) TMI 631

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tition challenging the order dated 23-9-2009 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short 'CESTAT'), South Zonal Bench, Chennai [2010 (17) S.T.R. 479 (Tribunal)]. 2. The petitioner filed an appeal. Pending the appeal, the petitioner sought for stay in Application No. 855/2009. Though the Tribunal has discretion to waive the pre-deposit, in the given circumstances .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Court also granted interim orders, it must be noted that there is no precedent in the matter of grant of interim orders. It is not as if the amount were being forfeited by the Revenue and on the contrary, the deposit is subject to the outcome of the appeal. 4. Under the circumstances, this court is not inclined to interfere with the interim order passed by the Tribunal. Hence, the Writ Peti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X