9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (3) TMI 949X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -deposit - the total amount of duty confirmed against the appellants is Rs.2,31,183/- and the appellants had already deposited a sum of R. 2,00,000/- as was promised on the last date of hearing - Considering the same, set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) to decide the same while considering the sum of Rs. 2 lakhs already deposited to be sufficient for th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Commissioner (Appeals), Lucknow. By the impugned order, the appeal was disposed of on account of non-deposit of the amount which was due and payable in terms of order passed by the adjudicating authority. The Deputy Commissioner, Lucknow dated 22.12.2009 had confirmed the demand of duty to the tune of Rs.2,31,183/- alongwith interest and equal amount of penalty against the appellants. Being aggrie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... impugned order, there is no case to show any leniency in favour of the appellants. 7. Undisputedly, the total amount of duty confirmed against the appellants is Rs.2,31,183/- and the appellants had already deposited a sum of R. 2,00,000/- as was promised on the last date of hearing. Considering the same, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Commissioner (Ap ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
