2011 (6) TMI 578

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... posing of their stay applications – Held that:- appeal Nos. E/949 and E/1280 of 2009 are dismissed for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - E/949, 1280 & 1281/09 - Mum - - - Dated:- 17-6-2011 - Shri Ashok Jindal, Shri P.R. Chandrasekharan, JJ. Appearance Shri Bharat Raichandani, Advocate for appellant Shri A.K. Prabhakar, JDR For Respon .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o the appellants why their appeals should not be dismissed for non-compliance of the stay orders passed by this Tribunal and the matter was adjourned for 10.06.2011. 2. When the matter was called for compliance on 10.06.2011 it was again reported by the learned Advocate for the appellant that the matters are coming before the Hon'ble High Court on 13.06.2011 and sought an opportunity to present .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X